Before the consultation
Write down what you notice: where hearing is hardest, which ear, since when, and what you hope will change. Bring previous audiograms and any operative reports. If a decision is expected, bring someone with you; two sets of ears remember more.
The seven questions
The surgical decision framework on this site is built from seven questions. In a consultation they sound like this:
- What is wrong, and how sure are we? A diagnosis should be tied to findings — the audiogram, the examination, imaging if it was done — rather than to a typical story.
- What is the operation for? “To improve hearing” is not specific. Closing a perforation, closing an air-bone gap, removing disease, and making a hearing aid unnecessary are different aims with different probabilities.
- How much better, and how likely? Ask for numbers: the expected gain in decibels, the chance of reaching it, the chance of no change.
- What else could we do? Waiting, a device, a different or smaller operation. The answer “nothing” should be rare.
- What are we protecting? The inner ear, the better ear, the balance system, taste, the facial nerve, and the options you may need in twenty years.
- What can go wrong? With frequencies, not adjectives. And what happens next if it does.
- Does this fit me? Your work, your other ear, your appetite for risk, your time for recovery.
Questions about the surgeon and the setting
It is legitimate to ask how often the surgeon performs this operation, what their own results are — including bone-conduction preservation — and who will be operating. It is also legitimate to ask how the result will be measured and when you will see it in writing.
When the answers are not clear
If the reasoning is not clear to you, ask again, or ask for it in writing. If a proposed operation does not fit the seven questions, or if you have been told it is the only option, a second opinion is reasonable and should not offend a good surgeon.
The surgical decision
Seven questions every recommendation should answer
-
Problem
What is wrong?
What exactly is wrong — which structure, confirmed by which test? Could anything else explain the hearing loss?
-
Objective
What are we trying to achieve?
What is the operation meant to achieve: a dry ear, a closed drum, a smaller air-bone gap, no hearing aid? Which of these is the main goal?
-
Expected benefit
What may improve?
How much hearing gain, in decibels and in daily terms, and with what probability? What is the chance of no improvement?
-
Alternatives
What other options exist?
What happens if we wait? What would a hearing aid or other device achieve? Is there a smaller operation?
-
Preservation
What existing hearing must be protected?
What is being protected: the inner ear, the other ear, the facial nerve, future options? How will preservation be verified?
-
Risk
What are the relevant trade-offs?
What can go wrong, how often, and how would each be dealt with? What is the chance of a worse ear?
-
Personal priorities
What matters to this individual?
What matters most to me — and does the plan reflect it?
This page provides general educational information. It cannot replace an individual assessment, which depends on a full history, examination, audiometry and, where relevant, imaging. If you have sudden hearing loss, severe pain, facial weakness, severe dizziness or discharge with fever, seek medical care promptly.